Gooooooooood morning Evansville!!! Well this day has started out very well. I only got 4 hours of sleep last night, but I'm wired like no other right now thanks to a cup of coffee and a can of Mountain Dew. Psychology proved to be quite interesting today. Perhaps the best word to describe my prof would be eclectic?

In other news, I received a letter from Residence Life last night which stated that I was guilty for "a violation of the campus alcohol policy." Well, that's just peachy. They are trying to fine me $50 and make me write a paper that "must cover a reflection of my involvement in the incident." I guess I'm really screwed because, problem is, I had no frickin' involvement in the incident!!! I'm pretty pissed about the fact that I'm being found guilty for something I didn't do. Even more frustrating is the "evidence," or should I say lack thereof, in the case against me. My name is mentioned twice in the report for being seen with the guy who was found guilty of having alcohol. After I left his room with him, they apparently searched it and found nothing in his room. They failed to search my room, give me a breathalizer, or inform me of their suspicion that I had involvment in the incident. So how can I prove my innocence, and how can they prove me guilty? Basically, there is no hard evidence in their case against me, and yet they still, out of sheer stupidity, found me guilty. Seriously folks, this is supposed to be an institution of higher learning, so why don't we try to apply what we have learned? If they don't overturn the ruling after I appeal I'm afraid that this school's judicial system is a total failure. ~ Rich


"That the innocent, though they may have some connexion or dependency upon the guilty (which, perhaps, they themselves cannot help), should not, upon that account, suffer or be punished for the guilty, is one of the plainest and most obvious rules of justice." ~ Adam Smith